News
Is Kennedy’s Campaign at Risk? Supreme Court Says No!

United States: The Supreme Court yesterday sterilized its intervention powers by refusing to take Robert F. Kennedy Jr., out of the official presidential lists in Wisconsin and Michigan.
Mr. Kennedy, an independent, paused his campaign in August and gave his support to former President Donald J. Trump. In the motions filed for emergency relief from the court, he has had to put up a constitutional argument that his right to free speech was violated when the states retain him on.
As reported by nytimes, the decisions made by the justices were not accompanied by any explanations and bear no signature, which is usual in such matters with the justices. As with the Montana challenge, there were no noted dissents in Wisconsin challenge. However, Justice Neil M. Gorsuch provided a dissenting opinion in the Michigan case and from earlier appeals’ court dissent in that case.
After endorsing Mr. Trump, Mr. Kennedy has had both the goal of being promptly eliminated from all state ballots and to also stay on them as long as possible. In September, the Supreme Court turned down another application by Mr. Kennedy that his name should be included in New York’s presidential ballot.
Even though early voting has commenced in both, Wisconsin and Michigan, Mr. Kennedy continued to argue that he was not dilatory in his effort to seek his removal from the ballots. His lawyers in appealing to the Supreme Court said that keeping him on compromised his “message of support for former President Trump.”
The fact that he still stayed out only demonstrated the difference between how major-party candidates and independent candidates were dealt with, Mr. Kennedy’s lawyers submitted, noting that Wisconsin gave major-party candidates an extra month to file if they wished to be on the presidential ballot.
“Deriving a person onto the ballot, as well they said, is compelled speech in violation of the First Amendment,” as did Wisconsin’s rules for independent candidates infringe upon the Constitution’s equal protection clause.
-
News4 weeks ago
AP Fights White House Ban Over Gulf of Mexico Naming Dispute
-
News4 weeks ago
U.S. Ends Requirement to Report Arms Use to Congress
-
News4 weeks ago
Pricey Path to Citizenship: USD5M Gold Card
-
News3 weeks ago
Ukraine’s Lithium at the Center of U.S. Security Talks
-
News4 weeks ago
No Indictment for Georgia Deputy in Deadly Shooting
-
News2 weeks ago
Managed Funds Association Pushes SEC for Regulatory Changes
-
News2 weeks ago
Maine’s USDA Funding Suspended Amid Sports Policy Dispute
-
News1 week ago
DOJ to Cut Costly Consultant Spending in Antitrust Cases